Minority Education

By the late 19th century, educational debatesunfortunate, that include the children of the
were still echoing on "who was to be educated?"immigrants.
and "how this education was to be carried out?"Bilingual Education
Such philosophers as John Dewey and (closer to
us) Jean Piaget understood that "all knowledge hasHistory & Rationale. As children of the lower
a special origin and the interests of the child areclass were failing in school and in life, bilingual
the primary source of learning" (Spring 1989). Theeducation (originally) was not meant to rescue
same author said that after the Civil War blackthem. On the contrary, it was designed to catch
leaders, particularly W.E. Dubois and Booker T.up with the Soviets after their launching of the
Washington debated not the importance ofSputnik, the first manned satellite (Cazabon, 1993).
schooling but the kind of education for blacks. TheThrough the National Defense Education Act
latter, considered by many blacks as a traitor,(NDEA), the United States Government hoped to
would acquiesce with the 1895 Plessy v. Fergusonbe competitive scientifically and technologically
decision that said under segregation schools canwhile being sophisticated in languages and cultures.
be separated and remained equal. According toAs waves of immigrants kept crashing onto our
Perkinson (1991), Washington addressed publicly inshores, the Federal government passed a series
1895,of legislations and decisions to deal with the
"....The Negro did not want social equality, that heproblem among which the 1965 Elementary
did not need social equality with the whites. Nor& Secondary Education Act (to attack
did he want or need political or civil equality ... butpoverty), the 1967 Bilingual Education, the 1974
cooperation with their white friends. NegroLau vs. Nichols (special aid to non-English speaking
education should be devoted to the practicalpupils) and the 1980 Department of Education
education of earning a living." P.48regulation (mandated Transitional Bilingual Education
But Dubois vehemently rejected that position andnationwide for limited English proficient students).
argued for equal rights. Meanwhile, diverseDespite all those efforts, Lambert held that there
segments of society had been restless protectingwere two faces of Bilingualism; one for language
their interests after the inaction of Plessy v.minorities and the other for the mainstream
Ferguson. The US Supreme Court solved manyAmericans (Cazabon, 1993). To such conservative
cases in favor of minorities such as Peirce v.politicians as former Senator Hayakawa, Bilingual
Society of sisters (1922, unconstitutionality ofEducation would hinder the English development of
forcing public schooling only) or Virginia Stateimmigrants (Minami & Kennedy, 1991). To
Board of Education v. Barnette (1940,those critics, Jim Cummings replied that students
unconstitutionality of forcing Jehovah Witness towho experienced a preschool program in which: a)
salute the flag). None of them delivered a blow totheir cultural identity was reinforced, b) their was
the racist establishment more significant thanactive collaboration with parents; and c) meaningful
Brown v. Board of Education of (1954), whichuse of language was integrated into every aspect
stipulated that separate education was inherentlyof daily activities; these pupils were developing
unequal. That decision invigorated the position ofhigh level of conceptual and linguistic skills in both
such minority leaders as Dr. Martin L. King wholanguage. Supportively, Krashen (1983) indicated
had long said that the reality of equality will requirethat all languages are acquired the same way
extensive adjustments in the way of life of thethrough four development stages, namely silent
white majority, an adjustment many are unwillingperiod or comprehension, early production, speech
to make", ( Smith & Chunn, 1989). Theemergence, and intermediate fluency. Given time,
Brown decision opened the valve for a flurry ofa comprehensible input, and a lower affective filter
other specific legislations to right the educational(anxiety-free) the young immigrant will excel.
wrongs done to minorities. For, Perkinson (1991)The situation of bilingual education let to believe
stated that black parents realized that theirthat the authorities either want to assimilate
children were failing in schools not because theyevery child into the main culture or to create bad
were culturally deprived but because the schoolscases of bilingual programs for the minorities
were incompetent to teach black students who,where they would be proficient in neither language.
indeed, had a culture, a different culture.In reply Skutnabb-Kangas (1986) had put forward
I remain convinced that, on the part of manythe Declaration of Linguistic Human Rights (the
folks, it was not a matter of how to educate ourrights to identify with, to learn, and to choose
culturally different children, but a deliberate casewhen to use one's mother tongue), especially in
of not willing to do so. If we take, for example,relation to small children, where it "is close to
Shor and Freire (1987), "It is not education whichcriminal, real psychological torture to use
shapes society, but on the contrary, it is societymonolingual teachers who do not understand what
that shapes education according to the intereststhe child has to say in her mother tongue"
of those who have power" p.35; and Perkinson(Skutnabb-Kangas & Cummins, 1986) p.28.
(1991) "By 1965 the schools had polarizedNonetheless, they registered many cases of
American society into self-satisfied whites andpositive as well as negative bilingual programs. The
victimized blacks, into despondent city dwellersadditive (positive) Bilingualism has been mostly
and indifferent suburb amenities by identifying andexperienced abroad, whereas most of the
creating winners and losers" p.220, we shall seesubtractive ones have been found in the United
that these points of view (Freire/Shor's andStates.
Perkinson's) are in direct contradiction while bothModels of Bilingual Programs.
being sensitive and in the interests of the